42            Common American Skunk

                          MEPHITIS CHINGA.--TIEDIMANN
                              [Mephitis mephitis]

                             COMMON AMERICAN SKUNK.
                                [Striped Skunk]

                              PLATE XLII.--FEMALE.

     Magnitudine F. cati; supra nigricans, stries albis longitudinalibus
insigneta; cauda longa villosissima.

     Size of a cat; general colour, blackish-brown, with white longitudinal
Stripes on the back; many varieties in its white markings; tail, long and bushy.


     OUINESQUE, Sagard Theodat, Canada, p. 748.
     ENFANT DU DIADLE, Charlevoix, Nouv. France, iii., p. 133.
     SKUNK-WEASEL, Pennant's Arctic Zool., vol. i., p. 85.
     SKUNK, Hearne's Journey, p. 377.
     MEPHITIS CHINGA, Tiedimann, Zool. i., p. 361, (Anh. 37,) 1808.
     POLE-CAT SKUNK, Kalm's Travels, vol. ii., p. 378.
     VIVERA MEPHITIS, Gmel. (L.) Syst. Nat., p. 88.
     MUSTELA AMERICANA, Desm. Mam., p. 186, A. D. 1820.
     MEPHITIS AMERICANA, Sab., Frank. Journal, p. 653.
     MEPHITIS AMERICANA, Harlan, Fauna, p. 70.
     THE SKUNK, Godm., Nat. Hist., vol. i., p. 213.
     MEPHITIS AMERICANA, Var. HUDSONICA, Rich., F.B.A., p. 65.
     MEPHITIS CHINGA, Lichtenstein, Darstellung neuer oder wenig bekannter
       Saugethiere, Berlin, 1827-34, xlv. Tafel, 1st figure.
     MEPHITIS CHINQUE, Licht., Ueber die Gattung Mephitis, p. 32, Berlin, 1838.
     MEPHITIS AMERICANA, Dekay, Nat. Hist. N.Y., pt. 1, p. 29.


     This species in all its varieties has a broad fleshy body, resembling that
of the wolverene; it stands low on its legs, and is much wider at the hips than
at the shoulders.  Fur, rather long and coarse, with much longer, smooth and
glossy hairs, interspersed.
     The head is small compared with the size of the body; forehead, somewhat
rounded; nose, obtuse, covered with short hair to the snout, which is naked;
eyes, small; ears, short, broad and rounded, clothed with hair on both surfaces;
whiskers, few and weak, extending a little beyond the eyes; feet, rather broad,
and covered with hair concealing the nails, which on the fore-feet are robust,
curved, compressed, and acute; palms, naked.  The trunk of the tail is nearly
half as long as the body.  Hair on the tail, very long and bushy, containing
from within an inch of the root to the extremity, no mixture of the finer fur.
The glands are situated on either side of the rectum:  the ducts are about an
inch in length, and are of a somewhat pyriform shape.  The inner membrane is
corrugated; the principal portion of the glands is a muscular tendinous
substance.  The sac is capable of containing about three drachms.  When the tail
is erected for the purpose of ejecting the nauseous fluid, the open orifices of
the ducts are perceptible on a black disk surrounding the anus.  The exit from
the duct at the anus when distended will admit a crow-quill.


     This species varies so much in colour that there is some difficulty in
finding two specimens alike; we have given a representation on our plate of the
colour which is most common in the Middle States, and which Dr. HARLAN described
as Mephitis Americana, our specimen only differing from his in having a
longitudinal stripe on the forehead.
     The under fur on all those portions of the body which are dark coloured, is
dark brown; in those parts which are light coloured, it is white from the roots.
These under colours, however, are concealed by a thick coat of longer, coarser
hairs, which are smooth and glossy.
     There is a narrow white stripe commencing on the nose and running to a
point on the top of the head; a patch of white, of about two inches in length,
and of the same breadth, commences on the occiput and covers the upper parts of
the neck; on each side of the vertebrae of the tail there is a broad
longitudinal stripe for three-fourths of its length; the tail is finally broadly
tipped with white, interspersed with a few black hairs.  The colour on every
other part of the body is blackish-brown.
     Another specimen from the same locality has a white stripe on the forehead;
a large white spot on the occiput, extending downwards, diverging on the back,
and continuing down the sides to within two inches of the extremity of the tail,
leaving the back, the end of the tail, and the whole of the under surface,
     The young on the plate are from the same nest; one has white stripes on the
back, with a black tail; the other has no stripes on the back, but the end of
its tail is white.
     In general we have found the varieties in a particular locality marked with
tolerable uniformity.  To this rule, however, there are many exceptions.
     In the winter of 1814 we caused a burrow to be opened in Rensselaer county,
N.Y., which we knew contained a large family of this species.  We found eleven:
they were all full grown, but on examining their teeth and claws, we concluded
that the family was composed of a pair of old ones, with their large brood of
young of the previous season.  The male had a white stripe on the forehead; and
from the occiput down the whole of the back had another white stripe four inches
in breadth; its tail was also white.  The female had no white stripe on the
forehead, but had a longitudinal stripe on each side of the back, and a very
narrow one on the dorsal line; the tail was wholly black.  The young differed
very widely in colour; we could not find two exactly alike; some were in part of
the colour of the male, others were more like the female, whilst the largest
proportion were intermediate in their markings, and some seemed to resemble
neither parent.  We recollect one that had not a white hair, except the tip of
the tail and a minute dorsal line.
     On the other hand, we had in February (the same winter) another family of
Skunks, captured with a steel-trap placed at the mouth of their burrow; they
were taken in the course of ten days, and we have reason to believe none
escaped.  In this family there was a very strong resemblance.  The animals which
we considered the old pair, had two longitudinal stripes on the back, with a
spot on the forehead; in the young, the only difference was, that in some of the
specimens the white line united on the back above the root of the tail, whilst
in others it extended down along the sides of the tail till it nearly reached
the extremity ;and in some of the specimens the tail was tipped with white, in
others, black.  We had an opportunity near Easton, Pennsylvania, of seeing an
old female Skunk with six young.  We had no knowledge of the colour of the male.
The female, however, had two broad stripes, with a very narrow black dorsal
line; the young differed considerably in their markings, some having black, and
others white, tails.
     In the sand-hills near Columbia, South Carolina, we met along the sides of
the highway four half-grown animals of this species; they all had a narrow white
line on each side of the back, and a small white spot on the forehead; the tails
of two of them were tipped with white the others had the whole of their tails
     From all the observations we have been able to make in regard to the
colours of the different varieties of this species, we have arrived at the
conclusion, that when a pair are alike in colour the young will bear a strong
resemblance in their markings to the old.  When on the contrary the parents
differ, the young assume a variety of intermediate colours.



     From point of nose to root of tail.  .  .  .  .  .  .   17
     Tail (vertebrae).  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    8 3/4
     Tail, to end of hair  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .   12 3/4
     Distance between eyes .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .    1 1/8
     From point of nose to corner of mouth.  .  .  .  .  .    1 3/8
                             Weight, 6 1/2 pounds.


     There is no quadruped on the continent of North America the approach of
which is more generally detested than that of the Skunk:  from which we may
learn that, although from the great and the strong we have to apprehend danger,
the feeble and apparently insignificant may have it in their power to annoy us
almost beyond endurance.
     In the human species we sometimes perceive that a particular faculty has
received an extraordinary development, the result of constant devotion to one
subject; whilst in other respects the mind of the individual is of a very
ordinary character.  The same remark will hold good applied to any particular
organ or member of the body, which, by constant use, (like the organs of touch
in the blind man,) becomes so improved as to serve as a substitute for others:
but in the lower orders of animals this prominence in a particular organ is the
result of its peculiar conformation, or of instinct.  Thus the power of the
rhinoceros is exerted chiefly by his nasal horn, the wild boar relies for
defence on his tusks, the safety of the kangaroo depends on his hind-feet, which
not only enable him to make extraordinary leaps, but with which be deals
vigorous blows, the bull attacks his foes with his horns, the rattlesnake's
deadly venom is conveyed through its fangs, and the bee has the means of
destroying some of its enemies by its sting, whilst in every other power for
attack or self-defence these various creatures are comparatively feeble.
     The Skunk, although armed with claws and teeth strong and sharp enough to
capture his prey, is slow on foot, apparently timid, and would be unable to
escape from many of his enemies, if he were not possessed of a power by which he
often causes the most ferocious to make a rapid retreat, run their noses into
the earth, and roll or tumble on the ground as if in convulsions; and, not
unfrequently, even the bravest of our boasting race is by this little animal
compelled suddenly to break off his train of thought, hold his nose, and run, as
if a lion were at his heels!
     Among the first specimens of natural history we attempted to procure was
the Skunk, and the sage advice to "look before you leap," was impressed on our
mind, through several of our senses, by this species.
     It happened in our early school-boy days, that once, when the sun had just
set, as we were slowly wending our way home from the house of a neighbour, we
observed in the path before us a pretty little animal, playful as a kitten,
moving quietly along:  soon it stopped, as if waiting for us to come near,
throwing up its long bushy tail, turning round and looking at us like some old
acquaintance:  we pause and gaze; what is it?  It is not a young puppy or a cat;
it is more gentle than either; it seems desirous to keep company with us, and
like a pet poodle, appears most happy when only a few paces in advance,
preceding us, as if to show the path:  what a pretty creature to carry home in
our arms!  it seems too gentle to bite; let us catch it.  We run towards it; it
makes no effort to escape, but waits for us; it raises its tail as if to invite
us to take hold of its brush.  We seize it instanter, and grasp it with the
energy of a miser clutching a box of diamonds; a short struggle ensues, when
faugh!  we are suffocated; our eyes, nose, and face, are suddenly bespattered
with the most horrible fetid fluid.  Imagine to yourself, reader, our surprise,
our disgust, the sickening feelings that almost overcome us.  We drop our prize
and take to our heels, too stubborn to cry, but too much alarmed and discomfited
just now, to take another look at the cause of our misfortune, and effectually
undeceived as to the real character of this seemingly mild and playful little
     We have never felt that aversion to the musky odour imparted by many
species of the ferine tribe of animals, that others evince; but we are obliged
to admit that a close proximity to a recently killed Skunk, has ever proved too
powerful for our olfactories.  We recollect an instance when sickness of the
stomach and vomiting were occasioned, in several persons residing in Saratoga
county, N.Y., in consequence of one of this species having been killed under
the floor of their residence during the night.  We have seen efforts made to rid
clothes which have been sprinkled by a Skunk, of the offensive odour:  resort
was had to burying them in the earth, washing, and using perfumes; but after
being buried a month they came forth almost as offensive as when they had first
been placed in the ground; and as for the application of odoriferous
preparations, it seemed as if all the spices of Araby could neither weaken nor
change the character of this overpowering and nauseating fluid.  Washing and
exposure to the atmosphere certainly weaken the scent, but the wearer of clothes
that have been thus infected, should he accidentally stand near the fire in a
close room, may chance to be mortified by being reminded that he is not
altogether free from the consequences of an "unpleasant" hunting excursion.
We have, however, found chloride of lime a most effectual disinfectant when
applied to our recent specimens.  That there is something very acrid in the
fluid ejected by the Skunk, cannot be doubted, when we consider its effects.
Dr. RICHARDSON states that he knew several Indians who lost their eyesight in
consequence of inflammation produced by its having been thrown into them by the
animal.  The instant a dog has received a discharge of this kind on his nose and
eyes, he appears half distracted, plunging his nose into the earth, rubbing the
sides of his face on the leaves and grass, and rolling in every direction.  We
have known several dogs, from the eyes of which the swelling and inflammation
caused by it did not disappear for a week; still we have seen others, which,
when on a raccoon hunt, did not hesitate, in despite of the consequences, to
kill every Skunk they started, and although severely punished at the time, they
showed no reluctance to repeat the attack the same evening, if a fresh subject
presented itself.
     This offensive fluid is contained in two small sacs situated on each side
of the root of the tail, and is ejected through small ducts near the anus.  We
have on several occasions witnessed the manner in which this secretion is
discharged.  When the Skunk is irritated, or finds it necessary to defend
himself, he elevates his tail over his back, and by a strong muscular exertion
ejects it in two thread-like streams in the direction in which the enemy is
observed.  He appears to take an almost unerring aim, and almost invariably
salutes a dog in his face and eyes.  Dr. RICHARDSON states that he ejects this
noisome fluid for upwards of four feet; in this he has considerably underrated
the powers of this natural syringe of the Skunk, as we measured the distance on
one occasion, when it extended upwards of fourteen feet.  The notion of the old
authors that this fluid is the secretion of the kidneys, thrown to a distance by
the aid of his long tail, must be set down among the vulgar errors, for in that
case whole neighbourhoods would be compelled to breath a tainted gale, as Skunks
are quite common in many parts of the country.
     The Skunk, in fact, is a very cleanly animal, and never suffers a drop of
this fluid to touch his fur; we have frequently been at the mouth of his burrow,
and although a dozen Skunks might be snugly sheltered within, we could not
detect the slightest unpleasant smell.  He is as careful to avoid soiling
himself with this fluid, as the rattlesnake is, not to suffer his body to come
in contact with his poisonous fangs.
     Should the Skunk make a discharge from this all-conquering battery during
the day, the fluid is so thin and transparent that it is scarcely perceptible;
but at night it has a yellowish luminous appearance; we have noticed it on
several occasions, and can find no more apt comparison than an attenuated stream
of phosphoric light.  That the spot where a Skunk has been killed will be
tainted for a considerable time, is well known.  At a place where one had been
killed in autumn, we remarked that the scent was still tolerably strong after
the snows had thawed away the following spring.  Generally, however, the spot
thus scented by the Skunk is not particularly offensive after the expiration of
a week or ten days.  The smell is more perceptible at night and in damp weather,
than during the day or in a drought.
     The properties of the peculiarly offensive liquor contained in the sacs of
the Skunk, have not, so far as we are advised, been fully ascertained.  It has,
however, been sometimes applied to medical purposes.  Professor IVES, of
New-Haven, administered to an asthmatic patient a drop of this fluid three times
a day.  The invalid was greatly benefited:  all his secretions, however, were
soon affected to such a degree, that he became highly offensive both to himself
and to those near him.  He then discontinued the medicine, but after having been
apparently well for some time, the disease returned.  He again called on the
doctor for advice,-- the old and tried recipe was once more recommended, but the
patient declined taking it, declaring that the remedy was worse than the
     We were once requested by a venerable clergyman, an esteemed friend, who
had for many years been a martyr to violent paroxysms of asthma, to procure for
him the glands of a Skunk; which, according to the prescription of his medical
adviser, were kept tightly corked in a smelling bottle, which was applied to his
nose when the symptoms of his disease appeared.
     For some time he believed that he had found a specific for his distressing
complaint; we were however subsequently informed, that having uncorked the
bottle on one occasion while in the pulpit during service, his congregation
finding the smell too powerful for their olfactories, made a hasty retreat,
leaving him nearly alone in the church.
     We are under an impression, that the difficulty of preparing specimens of
this animal may be to a considerable extent obviated, by a proper care in
capturing it.  If it has been worried and killed by a dog, skinning a recent
specimen is almost insupportable; but if killed by a sudden blow, or shot in a
vital part, so as to produce instant death, the Skunk emits no unpleasant odour,
and the preparation of a specimen is even less unpleasant than stuffing a mink.
We have seen several that were crushed in deadfalls, that were in nowise
offensive.  We had one of their burrows opened to within a foot of the
extremity, where the animals were huddled together.  Placing ourselves a few
yards off, we suffered them successively to come out.  As they slowly emerged
and were walking off, they were killed with coarse shot aimed at the shoulders.
In the course of half an hour, seven, (the number contained in the burrow,) were
obtained; one only was offensive, and we were enabled without inconvenience to
prepare six of them for specimens.
     The Skunk does not support a good character among the farmers.  He will
sometimes find his way into the poultry-house, and make some havoc with the
setting hens; he seems to have a peculiar penchant for eggs, and is not very
particular whether they have been newly laid, or contain pretty large rudiments
of the young chicken; yet he is so slow and clumsy in his movements, and creates
such a commotion in the poultry-house, that he usually sets the watch-dog in
motion, and is generally detected in the midst of his depreciations; when,
retiring to some corner, he is either seized by the dog, or is made to feel the
contents of the farmer's fowling piece.  In fact the poultry have far more
formidable enemies than the Skunk.  The ermine and brown weasel are in this
respect rivals with which his awkward powers cannot compare; and the mink is a
more successful prowler.
     The Skunk is so slow in his actions, that it is difficult to discover in
what manner he obtains food to enable him always to appear in good condition.
In the northern part of New-York the gray rabbit frequently retires to the
burrow of the fox, Maryland marmot, or Skunk.  Many of them remain in these
retreats during the day.  We have seen the tracks of the Skunk in the snow, on
the trail of the gray rabbit, leading to these holes, and have observed tufts of
hair and patches of skin scattered in the vicinity, betokening that the timid
animal had been destroyed.  We on one occasion marked a nest of the ruffed
grouse, (T. umbellus,) with the intention of placing the eggs under a common hen
a few days before they should hatch, but upon going after them we found they had
been eaten, and the feathers of the grouse were lying about the nest.  Believing
the depredator to have been an ermine, we placed a box-trap near the spot baited
with a bird; and on the succeeding night caught a Skunk, which we doubt not was
the robber.  This species also feeds on mice, frogs, and lizards; and during
summer no inconsiderable portion of its food consists of insects, as its
excrements usually exhibit the legs and backs of a considerable number of
     On dissecting a specimen which we obtained from the middle districts of
Carolina, we ascertained that the animal had been a more successful collector of
entomological specimens than ourselves, as he had evidently devoured on the
night previous a greater number (about a dozen) of a very rare and large beetle,
(Scarabaeus tityus,) than we had been able to find in a search of ten years.
     The Skunk being very prolific, would, if allowed to multiply around the
farm-yard, prove a great and growing annoyance.  Fortunately there are nocturnal
animals that are prowling about as well as he.  The dog, although he does not
eat this species, scarcely ever fails to destroy a Skunk whenever he can lay
hold of him.  A wolf that had been sent from the interior of Carolina to
Charleston, to be prepared as a specimen, we observed was strongly tainted with
the smell of this animal, and we concluded from hence, that as a hungry wolf is
not likely to be very choice in selecting his food, he will, if nothing better
offers, make a meal on it.  Whilst riding along the border of a field one
evening, we observed a large bird of some species darting to the ground, and
immediately heard a struggle, and were saluted by the odour from the "Enfant du
diable," as old CHARLEVOIX has designated the Skunk.  We visited the spot on the
following day, and found a very large animal of this species partly devoured.
We placed a fox-trap in the vicinity, and on the following morning found our
trap had captured a large horned owl, which had evidently caused the death of
the Skunk, as in point of offensive effluvia there was no choice between them
This species is generally very easily taken in traps.  It will not avoid any
kind of snare--is willing to take the bait, whether it be flesh, fish, or fowl,
and proves a great annoyance to the hunters whose traps are set for the fisher
and marten.  The burrows of the Skunk are far less difficult to dig out than
those of the fox.  They are generally found on a flat surface, whilst the dens
of the fox are more frequently dug on the side of a hill.  They have seldom more
than one entrance, whilst those of the fox have two, and often three.  The
gallery of the burrow dug by the Skunk runs much nearer the surface than that
excavated by the fox.  After extending seven or eight feet in a straight line,
about two feet beneath the surface, there is a large excavation containing an
immense nest of leaves.  Here during winter may be found lying, from five to
fifteen individuals of this species.  There are sometimes one or two galleries
diverging from this bed, running five or six feet further; in which, if the
burrow has been disturbed, the whole family may generally be found, ready to
employ the only means of defence with which Nature has provided them.
     This animal generally retires to his burrow about December, in the Northern
States, and his tracks are not again visible until near the tenth of February.
He lays up no winter store; and like the bear, raccoon, and Maryland marmot, is
very fat on retiring to his winter quarters, and does not seem to be much
reduced in flesh at his first appearance toward spring, but is observed to fall
off soon afterwards.  He is not a sound sleeper on these occasions; on opening
his burrow we found him, although dull and inactive, certainly not asleep, as
his black eyes were peering at us from the hole, into which we had made an
opening, seeming to warn us not to place too much reliance on the hope of
finding this striped "weasel asleep."
     In the upper districts of Carolina and Georgia, where the Skunk is
occasionally found, he, like the raccoon in the Southern States, does not retire
to winter quarters, but continues actively prowling about during the night
through the winter months.
     A large Skunk, which had been in the vicinity of our place, near New-York,
for two or three days, was one morning observed by our gardener in an old barrel
with only one head in, which stood upright near our stable.  The animal had
probably jumped into it from an adjoining pile of logs to devour an egg, as our
hens were in the habit of laying about the yard.  On being discovered, the Skunk
remained quietly at the bottom of the barrel, apparently unable to get out,
either by climbing or by leaping from the bottom.  We killed him by throwing a
large stone into the open barrel;--he did not make the least effort to eject the
nauseous fluid with which he was provided.  Had he not been discovered, he would
no doubt have died of starvation, as he had no means of escaping.  At times,
especially during the summer season, the Skunk smells so strongly of the fetid
fluid contained in his glands, that when one or two hundred yards distant it is
easily known that he is in the neighbourhood.
     We doubt not the flesh of the Skunk is well tasted and savoury.  We
observed it cooked and eaten by the Indians.  The meat was white and fat, and
they pronounced it better than the opossum,--infinitely superior to the raccoon,
(which they called rank meat,) and fully equal to roast pig.  We now regret that
our squeamishness prevented us from trying it.
     We have seen the young early in May; there were from five to nine in a
     The fur is rather coarse.  It is seldom used by the hatters, and never we
think by the furriers; and from the disagreeable task of preparing the skin, it
is not considered an article of commerce.

                           GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION.

     This species has a tolerably wide range, being found as far to the north as
lat. 56 degrees or 57 degrees.  We have met with it both in Upper and Lower
Canada, where it however appeared less common than in the Atlantic States.  It
is exceedingly abundant in every part of the Northern States.  In New-England,
New-York, and Pennsylvania, it is more frequently met with than in Maryland,
Virginia, and the more Southern States.  It is not uncommon on both sides of the
Virginia Mountains, and is well known in Kentucky, Indiana, and Illinois.  It is
not unfrequently met with in the higher portions of South Carolina, Georgia, and
Alabama.  In the alluvial lands of these three States, however, it is
exceedingly rare.  We possess in the Charleston Museum two specimens procured in
Christ Church Parish, by Professor EDMUND RAVENEL, that were regarded as a great
curiosity by the inhabitants.  It becomes more common a hundred miles from the
seaboard, and is not unfrequently met with in the sand-hills near Columbia.  To
the south we have traced it to the northern parts of Florida, and have seen it
in Louisiana.  To the west it has been seen as far as the banks of the
Mississippi.  LEWIS and CLARK, and others, frequently saw Skunks west of the
Rocky Mountains, near their winter encampments, but we have as yet had no means
of ascertaining that they were of this species.

                                GENERAL REMARKS.

     Although we do not regard the distribution of colours in the American
Skunk, as of much importance in deciding on the species, and hence, have
rejected as mere varieties, all those that can only be distinguished from each
other by their markings, we nevertheless differ very widely from Baron CUVIER
(Ossemens Fossiles, iv.) and others, who treat all the American Mephites as mere
varieties.  We have examined and compared many specimens in the museums of
Europe and America, and possess others from Texas and other portions of the
United States, and we feel confident that both in North and South America
several very distinct species exist.  We will endeavour, as we proceed in the
present work, to investigate their characters, and describe those species that
are found within the range to which we have restricted our inquiries.  We have
in the museums of London examined and compared the species described by BENNET,
(Proceeds. Zool. Soc., 1833, p. 39,) as M. nasuta, which appears to have been
previously described by Dr. LICHTENSTEIN, of Berlin, under the name of M.
mesoleuca, (Darst. der Saugeth. tab. 44, fig. 2,) as also several species
characterized by GRAY, (Magazine of Nat. Hist., 1837, p. 581,) that are very
distinct from the present.  In the immense collection existing in the museum at
Berlin, one of the best regulated museums in Europe, and which is particularly
rich in the natural productions of Mexico, Texas, California, and South
America, several species are exhibited that cannot be referred to our Skunk.  We
are under obligations to Dr. LICHTENSTEIN for a valuable work, (Darstellung
neuer oder wenig bekannter Saugethiere, Berlin, 1827-1834,) which contains
figures and descriptions of a number of new species of Skunks.  Also a
monograph, (Ueber die Gattung Mephitis, Berlin, 1838,) in sixty-five pages
quarto, with plates, which contains much learned research, and has greatly
extended our previous knowledge of the genus.  He describes seventeen species,
all, with one African exception, belonging to North and South America.  North of
Texas, however, he recognises only two species, the present, and Mephitis
interrupta, of RAFINESQUE; the latter, however, still requires a more careful
comparison.  All our American authors have applied the name Mephitis Americana,
of DESMAREST, to our present species.  It is now ascertained, however, that
TIEDIMANN described it twelve years earlier under the name of M. chinga, which,
according to the rigid rules to which naturalists feel bound to adhere, must be
retained, and we therefore have adopted it.